Do you understand MMA’s point system?

Share it

(By Professor Fabricio Monteiro*)

The current MMA point system basically sticks to the boxing tradition, where three judges usually attribute 10 points to the winner of each round and 9 or less to the opponent, producing some, at the very least, controversial and dubious results in some of the world’s biggest events.

The current criteria for awarding points basically adheres to the “Unified Rules of Conduct in MMA” established in 2000 by the New Jersey State Athletic Commission (NJAC), which take into account the athletes’ technique, like effective striking, effective grappling, ring control, effective aggressiveness, and defense.

However, the judges tend to assess the fight in a very subjective manner, most of the time awarding only a 1 point difference to the winner, whether he was superior in all the aforementioned criteria or in just one of them.

The characteristics of MMA allow for an uncountable array of techniques, styles, ways of fighting, making the style quite eclectic, and quite different from boxing. For example, how would one use the said criteria to judge a situation where a muay thai specialist uses his fists, elbows, knees and legs against a Jiu-Jitsu expert who manages to wrestle him to the ground a number of times, use ground and pound-style strikes, or when the grappler creates some opportunities to apply joint locks or chokes? And what if both of them got the better of their opponent with their respective skills over the course of the round? How does one judge this fight?

Rampage himself suprised to have won the judges’ decision over Machida at UFC 123. Photo: Josh Hedges.

I’ve identified one of the problems in this subjectivity of criteria as being each judge’s understanding of what a good fight is. Each judges according to his view of the sport – that is, according to his own criteria.

Now imagine a new point system, with six criteria that should be considered separately and independently, seeking greater objectivity and clarity. They are basically the same ones set forth by the NJAC, but each of them judged separately, in the following manner:

– Superiority in striking: Awarding points to the fighter who throws the most strikes that put the opponent in danger, who imposes his technique and demonstrates a broader and better repertory, strings together good combinations using the arms and legs.

– Takedowns: Awarding points to the athlete who takes his opponent down more times and to greater effect on the ground, or to the one who manages to successfully defend his opponent’s takedown attempts.

– Ground superiority: Judging the action playing out on the ground separately from the standup action. The following should be considered: successfully passing guard to arrive at superior positions, strikes landed via ground and pound, application of locks and chokes that put the opponent in danger, as well as guard replacement and reversals (sweeps) and effectively defending locks.

– Effective striking: Awarding points to the fighter who lands the greatest number of hard strikes on his opponent, visibly wounding or stunning him, both while on the feet and on the ground, also counting knockdowns achieved during standup fighting.

– Aggressiveness: Awarding points to the athlete who moves forward in attack, forces the action, attempts to corner his opponent, presents greater danger, accepts a straight-up fight, and strikes with momentum. Or, on the ground, the fighter who takes the most initiative, who alternates guard-passing moves with hard strikes, and who is efficient in not allowing his opponent room in which to move.

– Ring (or cage) control: Awarding points to the athlete who controls the pace and positioning of the fight; who, when standing, sets the range and imposes his moves, and, when on the ground, uses space in his favor. Another item to take into consideration is clinch control.

Once each criterion has been evaluated separately, then the judge can attribute, round by round, 1 point to the fighter who was superior in each of them, or 1 point to each should they be even, or even 0 should neither of the athletes perform the techniques satisfactorily.

For example, Fighter A did a better job of striking, landing more blows, being more aggressive and exhibiting better ring control. On the other hand, his opponent, Fighter B, landed two takedowns and had a superior display on the ground, landing a lot of hard strikes from ground and pound and stunning his opponent.

In this hypothetical case, we have 1 point for superior striking, 1 point for aggressiveness, and 1 point for ring control, coming to 3 points for Fighter A. Now Fighter B managed 1 point from takedowns, 1 point from ground control, and 1 point for effectiveness, also coming to 3 points. We thus have a 3-3 draw in this round.

This way there would be 6 points on the line in each round, which could end in a 6-6 draw if they are even across the board. But in the case of an even fight, but with one of the athletes leading by one takedown, he wins the round by 6-5. And, should great superiority be demonstrated, with one of the fighters drubbing the other, leading in all criteria, he may win the round by 6-0.

The aim of this new proposal is to contribute to the development and evolution of the existing rules. But I recognize that breaking from the boxing point system should play a part in this constant growth and evolution, giving rise to rules proper to MMA.

Should major American events not yet be apt to take on a new point system, that shouldn’t keep Brazilian pioneering from, once again, rearing its head. An initiative like this one would serve as an important reference for big events the world over. Brazil is already the soccer nation and, furthermore, we have Jiu-Jitsu and capoeira. Perhaps it’s time we get into fighting once and for all, to again become an MMA nation!

* Masters in physical education from the state university of Campinas (UNICAMP), kung-fu instructor, coordinator and teaching staff member for the Estácio UniRadial university Education Department, physical education teacher at São Paulo municipal school network, and council to São Paulo educators union (SINPEEM). Email: and

Ler matéria completa Read more
There are 113 comments for this article
  1. Flávia Roger at 12:31 pm

    As an appreciator of the MMA, I think what this approach in the punctuation criteria would be more just and more intelligible, if it was possible to sum all the aspects of the fight, not only one aspect. The winner would be much more unpredictable, since it would depend on the sum of the aspects, but it would let the show more fascinating . as a matter of fact it would be more difficult to check everything, but it could be more coherent.Congratulations!

  2. Pingback: td canada online
  3. Pingback: Harold Jahn Edmonton
  4. Pingback: carpet cleaning companies in welwyn garden city
  5. Pingback: dvla eu driving license exchange
  6. Pingback: 메이저놀이터
  7. Pingback: Gibraltar Mailboxes THHB0001 manuals
  8. Pingback: Rizact
  9. Pingback: cialis professional ingredients
  10. Pingback: 800 mg viagra
  11. Pingback: brand cialis for sale
  12. Pingback: slot game
  13. Pingback: real cialis prices
  14. Pingback: thesis editing service
  15. Pingback: help in thesis writing
  16. Pingback: metformin prescription cost
  17. Pingback: propecia for hair loss
  18. Pingback: buy propecia no prescription
  19. Pingback: can i buy cialis online
  20. Pingback: non prescription ed drugs
  21. Pingback: pharmacies in canada that ship to the us
  22. Pingback: monthly cost of cialis without insurance
  23. Pingback: Zakhar Berkut hd
  24. Pingback: 4569987
  25. Pingback: cialis without prescriptions canada
  26. Pingback: buy cialis online cheap
  27. Pingback: generic 20 mg tadalafil
  28. Pingback: news news news
  29. Pingback: instant payday loans fitchburg
  30. Pingback: psy
  31. Pingback: psy2022
  32. Pingback: projectio-freid
  33. Pingback: buy tretinoin cream
  34. Pingback: cash advance loans bowie
  35. Pingback: how long before sex should you take viagra
  36. Pingback:
  37. Pingback: topvideos
  38. Pingback: video
  39. Pingback: buy rush
  40. Pingback: buy rush
  41. Pingback: cost of prinivil
  42. Pingback:
  43. Pingback: Ukrainskie-serialy
  44. Pingback: site
  45. Pingback: cialis generic alternative
  46. Pingback: п»їbuy lisinopril 10 mg uk
  47. Pingback: women and cialis
  48. Pingback: how to buy ativan in mexico
  49. Pingback: top
  50. Pingback: brand cialis 20 mg
  51. Pingback: should cialis be taken on an empty stomach
  52. Pingback: Urispas
  53. Pingback: where can u buy cialis
  54. Pingback: accutane canadian pharmacy
  55. Pingback: prescription drugs account for 25% of all healthcare-related costs.
  56. Pingback: generic cialis 20 mg tadalafil
  57. Pingback: cheap generic cialis
  58. Pingback: cialis online daily
  59. Pingback: canadian pharmacy cialis 20mg
  60. Pingback: replica omega watches
  61. Pingback: pills for ed
  62. Pingback: male erection pills
  63. Pingback: injections for ed
  64. Pingback: viagra over the counter walmart
  65. Pingback:
  66. Pingback: chelovek-iz-90-h
  67. Pingback:
  68. Pingback: natural ed treatment
  69. Pingback: bender na4alo 2021
  70. Pingback: blogery_i_dorogi
  71. Pingback: blogery_i_dorogi 2 blogery_i_dorogi
  72. Pingback: best ed pills
  73. Pingback: natural ed remedies
  74. Pingback: stromectol tablets
  75. Pingback: plaquenil generic coupon
  76. Pingback: plaquenil uk
  77. Pingback: stromectol 3mg cost
  78. Pingback: ivermectin 8 mg
  79. Pingback: home remedies for ed
  80. Pingback: chernaya vodova
  81. Pingback: 66181
  82. Pingback: ed pills comparison
  83. Pingback: Porno
  84. Pingback: vechernyy urgant
  85. Pingback: ukraine
  86. Pingback: viagra discount
  87. Pingback: viagra cost
  88. Pingback: viagra amazon
  89. Pingback: A3ixW7AS
  90. Pingback: buy cialis ebay
  91. Pingback: buy cialis online best price
  92. Pingback: gidonline-ok-google
  93. Pingback: link
  94. Pingback: KremlinTeam
  95. Pingback:
  96. Pingback:
  97. Pingback: plaquenil 200
  98. Pingback:
  99. Pingback:
  100. Pingback: generic cialis
  101. Pingback: cialis cheapest prices
  102. Pingback: Suicide Squad 2
  103. Pingback: psiholog
  104. Pingback: viagra bottle
  105. Pingback: cialis vs sildenafil
  106. Pingback: finasteride online pharmacy
  107. Pingback: gabapentin and viagra
  108. Pingback: alternative to viagra
  109. Pingback: hizhnyak-07-08-2021
  110. Pingback: zithromax without prescription
  111. Pingback: cvs viagra over the counter
  112. Pingback: online pharmacy delivery usa
  113. Pingback: canadian pharmacy world coupons

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.